Don’t Embarrass Me
by wjw on March 12, 2013
I’ve been “enjoying” (if that is indeed the right word) the “controversy” (if that’s what it is) over on John Scalzi’s blog concerning the unconscionable contract boilerplate which Random House proposes to inflict upon the victims, um, I mean authors in its new ebook programs.
I won’t summarize the issues here, that’s what the link is for. Suffice it to say that the loathsome little asswipes at Random House propose to acquire all rights for no money and charge the author for expenses normally incurred by the publisher, such as conversion fees, plant costs, etc., including printing costs if the publisher decides to produce a physical copy (which they can, y’see, having acquired all rights for no money).
It is no surprise that Random House has acquired its share of defenders, because, y’know, it’s the Internet, where stupid people are allowed, and some aim to achieve a sort of pathetic fame by being stupid in a singularly noisy and obnoxious way. The Internet is like a big house, in which there are pleasant parlors and well-stocked kitchens. But in a house there are also toilets, and sometimes the toilets have turds in them.
Labored metaphors aside, seeing President Scalzi unload on Random House and its benighted followers is dreadfully amusing, if you’re amused by that sort of thing, dreadful as it is.
What I’d like to do is address the matter from the perspective of a writing teacher. Because what I’d like to tell my students is this: If you ever sign a contract like that, I will be deeply embarrassed for you.
Because it means you have no goddam pride, either in yourself or in your work.
If you have even the least bit of ambition as a creative person, you want to be proud of what you create. You want to point at it and say, This is mine, and nobody but me could have done this.
And if you’re proud of your work, you think it’s worth something. You don’t throw it away. You don’t pay someone to publish it, because that means that you think it’s so bad that no one will publish it unless you bribe them first.
The Random House contracts violate Rule Number One of the writing business: Money flows to the writer. If the money flows in any other direction, there’s something profoundly wrong, and probably the writer is being scammed.
What you’re saying if you sign the contract is this: I am am a pathetic whipped dog begging for scraps at the table of my master, even though I know ahead of time that I won’t get any scraps but just another beating.
Now if you decide to become an indie publisher and publish your work yourself, either in e-formats or audio book or something else, that’s a different matter. In that case you pay contractors like an editor or copy-editor or cover artist to help produce a professional work that readers will want to buy. I’ve done this with my backlist that I’ve made available in e-formats. And the key thing in this case is: you pay them once and it’s over. You don’t give away your work to them. They have no more claim on you once they’ve been paid for their work. They’re your employees. You’re the publisher, and they work for you.
So do your work as well as you can, and treat it, and yourself, with pride. Because if you don’t have pride in what you create, you can be damn well sure nobody else will.
Previous post: Geek Fail!
Next post: Works of Art
> If you have even the least bit of ambition as a creative person, you want to be proud of what you create. You want to point at it and say, This is mine, and nobody but me could have done this.
Seems like the same could be said for folks who choose to go with traditional publishers instead of self-publishing.
I’m not saying that I ENDORSE that view, but it’s a coherent argument.
For the record, I think that the market penetration that a publisher can give makes it a good deal…ESPECIALLY for an pro author who’s already got a track record.
…but for an as-yet unpublished author (like myself), the issues in deciding between applying to a real publisher and going indie are pretty similar to the ones you lay out re Random House.
Reasons for a new author to go with a publisher:
* social imprint of legitimacy
* a $5,000 advance is a floor: if you cash the check, you get at least $5k from your books.
Reasons for a new author to go indie:
* have enough faith in earning potential of one’s novel that trading 60% of the revenue away for a guaranteed $5k seems like a bad bet
* the idea of submitting something to a slush pile and waiting 12-24 months to hear anything is insulting. Publishers should treat writers – even as-yet unpublished writers – as professionals and deal with their submissions promptly, the same way they’d return a phone call to an accountant or a lawyer promptly.
Personally, I’m leaning AGAINST submitting to a publisher (even though an acquaintance with contacts at a major house has said that he could put in a word and potentially leapfrog my manuscript past the 12 month slush pile delay). Why? Some combination of both of the latter two bullet points. I think that publishers being so slow to go through their slush is insulting, and because I have enough pride in my manuscript that I’m willing to gamble for all the marbles.
> In that case you pay contractors like an editor or copy-editor or cover artist to help produce a professional work that readers will want to buy.
We agree here; from having launched other ventures, I entirely agree that delivering a professional product to the end consumer is NOT optional.
> So do your work as well as you can, and treat it, and yourself, with pride. Because if you don’t have pride in what you create, you can be damn well sure nobody else will.
100% agreed.
It’s up on Scalzi’s blog this morning that Random House caved, at least a little, in regards to the contract. I guess social media can apply enough pressure to get even large companies like Random House to notice.
TJ>> I’m not beating the drums for indie pub, especially for new writers. I’m in a sweet spot with a reading public already established and a large backlist.
A new indie writer not only has to publish his own work, he has to figure out some way to promote it. It’s no service to readers or to the writer if it’s available on Amazon alongside 20,000 other self-published books that no one’s heard of.
There are tricks to getting out of the slush pile, and the best one is just to get to know people. Go to conventions and such. When editors see your name and remember having met you, they’ll get to your work more quickly.
Also, see if you can email the editors and get them to solicit the ms. A solicited ms., addressed to an editor by name, is read much quicker than an unsolicited ms. addressed “to whom it may concern.”
While it is insulting that publishers take so long to read a manuscript, that’s only their *first* insult. There are many more insults to come.
As for signing a contract giving your work away … a publisher who pays nothing for a manuscript isn’t going to value it, and is hardly likely to spend any money promoting it.
It could be worse.
“By reading this contract, or having the potential to read it, you agree to be bound to it’s terms and conditions….”
Comments on this entry are closed.